fbpx
  • NAVC Brands
https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/table-of-contents-july-august-2021/
Featured, Parasitology

Ear Mites: Uncovering, Treating, and Preventing Infestations

Routine diagnostic tests can miss Otodectes cynotis infestations, but safe treatment is readily available for both dogs and cats.

Susan LittleDVM, PhD, DACVM

Dr. Little is Regents Professor and the Krull-Ewing Professor in Veterinary Parasitology at the Oklahoma State University (OSU) College of Veterinary Medicine. She is past-president of the American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists (AAVP) and the Companion Animal Parasite Council and serves as co-Director of the National Center for Veterinary Parasitology. In 2017 Dr. Little received the Distinguished Veterinary Parasitologist Award from the AAVP.

Kathryn DuncanDVM

Dr. Duncan is a graduate of the University of Tennessee’s College of Veterinary Medicine and the Boehringer Ingelheim resident in veterinary parasitology at OSU through the National Center for Veterinary Parasitology. Her most recent publications discuss ticks of importance to dogs and cats and intestinal parasites detected from dogs attending dog parks. Her current research interests include ticks and tick-borne diseases, heartworm disease, and diagnosis and treatment of intestinal parasites of domestic animals. 

Ear Mites: Uncovering, Treating, and Preventing Infestations
Arthiti Kholoet/shutterstock.com
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Although most often identified in young cats, ear mites (Otodectes cynotis) are a common cause of otitis externa and pruritus in cats and dogs worldwide. Most veterinary healthcare team members are familiar with the copious dark, granular otic discharge of newly adopted kittens that indicates mites are likely to be found on otoscopic or microscopic examination. Some patients with ectopic mites present with generalized alopecia and pruritus similar to flea allergy dermatitis.1 Although under-recognized, ear mite infestations can be readily addressed. Being aware of this common parasite is a key first step.

BIOLOGY

Life Cycle 

Female O cynotis mites cement developing eggs to the epidermal lining of the ear canal; larvae hatch in a few days and molt through 2 nymphal stages to the next generation of adults. Ear mites feed on epithelial cells, exudate, and tissue fluid but do not burrow. The entire life cycle takes less than 3 weeks. Infestation follows direct contact and commonly occurs from dam to offspring in the neonatal period. Although documented, off-host mite survival is considered limited.2,3

Morphology

Adult O cynotis are large mites; at approximately 400 µm, females may be visible without magnification. When examined by microscopy, mites are usually active and a large, single egg is often present within females (FIGURE 1A). The first 2 pairs of legs of the female end in caruncles (suckers) attached to very short stalks; the fourth pair of legs on the female is vestigial. Males (FIGURE 1B) are slightly smaller than females and have distinct copulatory structures on the ventral surface. All legs on male O cynotis end in suckers attached to short stalks.4 

Epidemiology

Prevalence estimates vary widely based on the population examined and the sensitivity of the diagnostic method used. A survey of pet cats from 7 European countries found ear mites were the most common ectoparasite, present in 17.4% of cats, and more commonly recovered from cats than fleas.5 In a survey in northern Italy, over half of the free-roaming cats examined had clinical evidence of otitis externa and O cynotis was found in the majority.6 Infested animals with asymptomatic infestations serve as important reservoirs. 

In general, ear mites are most common in young, free-roaming cats and dogs and in pets with outdoor access, although as many as 25% of pet cats and 6.7% of pet dogs are infested.7-10 Although mites are most commonly identified in kittens, age-related differences in ear mite prevalence are not consistent and adult cats are frequently infested. Similarly, breed, sex, and age have not been associated with increased infestation prevalence in dogs.11 Ferrets and wild canids, especially foxes, are commonly infested.12,13 

Transmission

Because mite survival off-host is limited, direct contact with an infested animal is the most likely mode of transmission.3,4 Mites are transmitted among all age classes and between infested dams and nursing young. Transmission between cats, dogs, and ferrets is also possible.2 As many as 10% of cats harbor subclinical infestations, serving as a source for future infestations.9,14 O cynotis does not pose a major zoonotic risk; however, reports of human infestations exist, as do cases of dermatitis following close contact with an infested animal.2,12

CLINICAL SIGNS

Animals with O cynotis infestations present clinically normal or with otic pruritus that is usually bilateral.7 Magnitude of clinical signs appears to be independent of the number of mites. Cats may have significant infestations with minimal pruritus, whereas dogs are more likely to be pruritic.1 Symptomatic animals display varying degrees of irritation and pruritus associated with head shaking, head tilt, and circling; a pinnal-pedal reflex can be elicited when the infested ear canal is massaged.15 

A dark, “coffee ground” otic discharge is a classic presentation (FIGURE 2), although the color and consistency vary, and some infested cats have scant cerumen.12 Severely infested animals or those with hypersensitivity reactions can present with self-excoriation and dermal trauma. Hematomas and secondary infections are not uncommon.12 Less common clinical presentations include miliary dermatitis of the head, feet, or tail due to ectopic mites.1,12 Left untreated, infested animals, particularly cats, may become emaciated or develop neurologic signs.15

Ear mites are a common cause of otitis externa, with as many as 85% of feline cases and 50% of canine cases reportedly associated with O cynotis infestation.16 Additionally, chronic, uncontrolled O cynotis infestation and the resultant ceruminous gland hyperplasia have been linked with development of ceruminous gland tumors in some animals.13,17 A diffuse hypersensitivity reaction resembling flea allergy dermatitis, in which pets present with widespread pruritus, excessive grooming, and alopecia, has been described as associated with ectopic ear mites in some patients.1,15

Pathology of O cynotis infestation develops from inflammation caused by mite feeding and includes accumulation of moderate to excessive dark brown ceruminous exudate.4 Some infested pets display minimal pathology even though the presence of mites is confirmed.9 When pathologic changes are present, the epithelium of the ear canal is usually erythematous, hyperplastic, and hyperkeratotic. Histopathologic examination shows hyperplastic sebaceous and ceruminous glands, dilated blood vessels, and macrophage and mast cell infiltrates.1,2 When treatment is delayed, secondary bacterial and fungal infections can develop; Staphylococcus and Malassezia species are most commonly identified.18 

DIAGNOSIS

Mites can be visualized directly in the ear canal, crawling on the surface of otic discharge, during routine otoscopic examination (FIGURE 3). However, relying on this method alone misses many infestations.9 In one comparison study, one-third of infested cats were not diagnosed when examined by otoscope alone.19 Infestations are more likely to be detected by microscopic examination of samples collected from both ears.7,19 Although otic discharge, pruritus, acne-like lesions, and head shaking are present in some infested pets, others will have large numbers of mites with scant evidence of pruritus or discharge, and the ears of some animals that harbor O cynotis appear normal.9 

To examine for ear mites, material from both ears can be collected with a cotton-tipped swab lightly coated in mineral oil and then transferred to a microscope slide (FIGURE 4). Research on ear mite prevalence has shown that, when present in low numbers, mites can be missed by swabbing alone.7 Curettage to collect cerumen or flushing the external ear canal with a small amount of mineral oil increases sensitivity of detection but is often impractical in a clinical setting.7,19 Response to treatment—resolution of either otic pruritus or, in the case of hypersensitivity, diffuse allergic pruritus—can be used to support a clinical diagnosis if ear mites are not recovered.1

TREATMENT

Several safe, effective ear mite treatments are available for both cats (Table 1) and dogs (Table 2). Macrocyclic lactones are label-approved to treat ear mites in cats or dogs, including transdermal, systemic formulations of moxidectin and selamectin and otic formulations of ivermectin and milbemycin oxime.22,28 Systemic isoxazolines (afoxolaner, fluralaner, lotilaner, sarolaner) are also effective and can be used alone or in combination with a macrocyclic lactone.20,21,25-27,29 Use of systemic products targets mites outside the ear canal and can limit the diffuse hypersensitivity reaction seen in some patients. 

Historically, other treatments were commonly used to clear ear mite infestations. Mineral oil applied to the ear canal reduces mite populations; however, many repeated treatments are needed, aggressive cleaning can exacerbate otitis or cause trauma, and an oily residue can be left on the animal.2 Several otic products containing low-concentration pyrethrins (e.g. Otomite Plus; Virbac, virbac.com) are EPA-approved for treating ear mites in dogs and cats. Other otic formulations have been suggested, including preparations containing pesticides, but insufficient evidence supports their use and adverse events are reported.22 Prior to the development of safer and more effective treatments, ear mites were sometimes managed by administering large animal preparations of macrocyclic lactones off-label. This approach has safety concerns and is no longer necessary or recommended. 

Common sequelae of infestation, such as ear discharge and inflammation, should be addressed to support resolution of clinical signs. Although not necessarily required per label, the debris within the ear canals can be cleared away with a mild ceruminolytic agent formulated for otic use before initial treatment to ensure proper contact with an otic acaricide, address the clinical signs, and relieve patient discomfort. Cleaning the ears may need to be repeated if debris persists or recurs, but care should be taken to avoid irritating the ear canal.30 When present, secondary bacterial or fungal infections should be treated concurrently with acaricide administration.18

Reinfestation following treatment readily occurs.31 Regardless of clinical signs, all pets in the home that can be infested with ear mites (cats, dogs, ferrets) should be treated. Repeated monthly treatment with persistent acaricides is ideal; subclinical infestations that go untreated are the primary cause of reinfestation. Many products with efficacy against ear mites (macrocylic lactones and isoxazolines) have other benefits supporting their use in practice, including efficacy against fleas, ticks, intestinal parasites, and heartworms. 

CONCLUSION

Although common in free-roaming animals,9,32 the true prevalence of O cynotis in cats and dogs across the United States is not fully understood. Routine diagnostic tests can miss infestations, meaning ear mites are likely under-diagnosed. Careful diagnostic evaluation and routine use of acaricides—including transdermal macrocyclic lactones and isoxazolines commonly used for flea, tick, and internal parasite control—help mitigate infestation with this common parasite. 

References

1. Miller WH, Griffin CE. Parasitic skin disease. In: Miller WH, Griffin CE, Campbell K, eds. Muller and Kirk’s Small Animal Dermatology. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby; 2012:284-342.

2. Bowman DD, Hendrix CM, Lindsay DS, Barr SC. Arthropods. In: Feline Clinical Parasitology. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press; 2001:355-445.

3. Otranto D, Milillo P, Mesto P, et al. Otodectes cynotis (Acari:Psoroptidae): examination of survival off-the-host under natural and laboratory conditions. Exp Appl Acarol. 2004;32(3):171-179.

4. Greiner E. Arthropods. In: Zajac A, Conboy G, eds. Veterinary Clinical Parasitology. 8th ed. Ames, IA:
Wiley-Blackwell; 2012:217–303.

5. Beugnet F, Bourdeau P, Chalvet-Monfray K, et al. Parasites of domestic owned cats in Europe:
co-infestations and risk factors. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:291.

6. Perego R, Proverbio D, De Giorgi GB, et al. Prevalence of otitis externa in stray cats in northern Italy.
J Feline Med Surg. 2014;16(6):483-490.

7. Sotiraki ST, Koutinas AF, Leontides LS, et al. Factors affecting the frequency of ear canal and face infestation by Otodectes cynotis in the cat. Vet Parasitol. 2001;96(4):309-315.

8. Xhaxhiu D, Kusi I, Rapti D, et al. Ectoparasites of dogs and cats in Albania. Parasitol Res.
2009;105(6):1577-1587.

9. Akucewich LH, Philman K, Clark A, et al. Prevalence of ectoparasites in a population of feral cats from north central Florida during the summer. Vet Parasitol. 2002;109(1-2):129-139.

10. Chee JH, Kwon JK, Cho HS, et al. A survey of ectoparasite infestations in stray dogs of Gwang-ju City, Republic of Korea. Korean J Parasitol. 2008;46(1):23-27.

11. Souza CP, Ramadinha RR, Scott FB, Pereira MJS. Factors associated with the prevalence of Otodectes cynotis in an ambulatory population of dogs. Pesq Vet Bras. 2008;28(8):375-378.

12. Bowman DD. Arthropods. In: Bowman DD, ed. Georgis’ Parasitology for Veterinarians. 11th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2021:63-80.

13. Moriarty ME, Vickers TW, Clifford DL, et al. Ear mite removal in the Santa Catalina Island Fox (Urocyon littoralis catalinae): controlling risk factors for cancer development. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144271.

14. Milley C, Dryden M, Rosenkrantz W, et al. Comparison of parasitic mite retrieval methods in a population of community cats. J Feline Med Surg. 2017;19(6):657-664.

15. Mullen GR, O’Connor BM. Mites (Acari). In: Mullen GR, Durden LA, eds. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2nd ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 2009:443-492.

16. Wall R, Shearer D, eds. Mites. In: Veterinary Ectoparasites: Biology, Pathology and Control. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Sciences; 2001:23-54.

17. Trevelline BK, Stephenson JF, Kohl KD. Two’s company, three’s a crowd: exploring how host-parasite-microbiota interactions may influence disease susceptibility and conservation of wildlife. Mol Ecol. 2020;29(8):1402-1405.

18. Roy J, Bédard C, Moreau M. Treatment of feline otitis externa due to Otodectes cynotis and complicated by secondary bacterial and fungal infections with Oridermyl auricular ointment. Can Vet J.
2011;52(3):277-282.

19. Combarros D, Boncea AM, Brément T, et al. Comparison of three methods for the diagnosis of otoacariasis due to Otodectes cynotis in dogs and cats. Vet Dermatol. 2019;30(4):334-e96.

20. Taenzler J, de Vos C, Roepke RK, et al. Efficacy of fluralaner against Otodectes cynotis infestations in dogs and cats. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):30.

21. Bosco A, Leone F, Vascone R, et al. Efficacy of fluralaner spot-on solution for the treatment of Ctenocephalides felis and Otodectes cynotis mixed infestation in naturally infested cats. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):28.

22. Yang C, Huang HP. Evidence-based veterinary dermatology: a review of published studies of treatments for Otodectes cynotis (ear mite) infestation in cats. Vet Dermatol. 2016;27(4):221-e56.

23. Arther RG, Davis WL, Jacobsen JA, et al. Clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of 10% imidacloprid + 2.5% moxidectin topical solution for the treatment of ear mite (Otodectes cynotis) infestations in dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2015;210(1-2):64-68.

24. Nolan TJ, Lok JB. Macrocyclic lactones in the treatment and control of parasitism in small companion animals. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012; 13(6):1078-1094.

25. Carithers D, Crawford J, de Vos C, et al. Assessment of afoxolaner efficacy against Otodectes cynotis infestations of dogs. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):635.

26. Machado MA, Campos DR, Lopes NL, et al. Efficacy of afoxolaner in the treatment of otodectic mange in naturally infested cats. Vet Parasitol. 2018;256:29-31.

27. Six RH, Becskei C, Mazaleski MM, et al. Efficacy of sarolaner, a novel oral isoxazoline, against two common mite infestations in dogs: Demodex spp. and Otodectes cynotis. Vet Parasitol. 2016;222:62-66.

28. Nunn-Brooks L, Michael R, Ravitz LB, et al. Efficacy of a single dose of an otic ivermectin preparation or selamectin for the treatment of Otodectes cynotis infestation in naturally infected cats. J Feline Med Surg. 2011;13(8):622-624.

29. Becskei C, Reinemeyer C, King VL, et al. Efficacy of a new spot-on formulation of selamectin plus sarolaner in the treatment of Otodectes cynotis in cats. Vet Parasitol. 2017;238 Suppl 1:S27-S30.

30. Arther RG. Mites and lice: biology and control. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009;39(6):1159-1171.

31. Saridomichelakis MN, Koutinas AF, Gioulekas D, et al. Sensitization to dust mites in cats with Otodectes cynotis infestation. Vet Dermatol. 2002;10(2):89-94. doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3164.1999.00135.x

32. Thomas JE, Staubus L, Goolsby JL, Reichard MV. Ectoparasites of free-roaming domestic cats in the central United States. Vet Parasitol. 2016;228:17-22.

[2
[2
2]
2]
MENU